The Centre for Convention on Democratic Integrity (CCDI) has said that President Bola Tinubu has never been indicted, prosecuted, or convicted by any court in the United States on drug-related or criminal charges.
The CCDI, in a statement by its President, Olufemi Aduwo, said the allegations against the President are not new.
He emphasized that these claims were thoroughly scrutinized during the 2023 presidential election and were addressed not only in legal circles but also in the broader court of public opinion.
Aduwo said: “The recent directive by Judge Beryl Howell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, instructing certain United States agencies to release investigative records allegedly linked to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has predictably triggered a wave of sensational commentary.
“However, viewed through a measured and dispassionate lens, there is nothing unprecedented in this development. The principal issue, namely, the civil forfeiture of $460,000 in 1993, has been firmly embedded in the public domain for decades.
“It underwent intense scrutiny during the 2023 presidential election and was adjudicated not only in legal circles but also in the broader court of public opinion. Its inability to hinder President Tinubu’s electoral ascension is, in itself, telling.
“Indeed, it must be restated with absolute clarity: President Tinubu has never been indicted, prosecuted, or convicted by any court in the United States on drug-related or any criminal charges.
“The fact that his name may have appeared in affidavits or that he had acquaintances who were subject to investigation does not, either legally or logically, impute guilt.
“Legal jurisprudence draws a clear line between association and liability. Guilt is neither presumed by proximity nor media speculation. It is established by probative evidence, formal charges, and a conviction secured through due process before a court of competent jurisdiction.
“Let us be reminded that even an ordinary visitor to the United States who fails to declare a cash amount above regulatory thresholds risks civil forfeiture. This is a standard administrative procedure, not an indication of criminal wrongdoing.
“The opposition, in their bid for political traction ahead of 2027, must desist from constructing a cathedral upon a foundation so evidently tenuous. Political capital should not be manufactured from recycled allegations that have already been litigated, formally and informally.
“Governance credibility is earned through sound policy alternatives, not through incessant regurgitation of speculative claims. At the end of the day, should any documents be released by United States agencies, their probative value may be no greater than that of discarded newspapers or, more bluntly, toilet tissue.
“Let it not be forgotten that former President Obasanjo and Mallam Nasir El-Rufai leveled serious accusations against Alhaji Atiku Abubakar in their respective publications, yet these did little to stifle his aspirations or following.
“We must, therefore, rise above this cyclical fixation with bygone controversies. Let our politics shift from recrimination to reconstruction, from innuendo to institution-building, and from character assassination to credible engagement.”
